Skip to content

Glossary · Hiring & terms

Succession planning

Succession planning is the process of identifying and preparing future leaders to step into critical roles before they fall vacant, so a departure doesn't leave a gap the business can't fill.

Good succession planning blends internal development with an external map of the market, so a board always knows its options for a key seat, including candidates it hasn't yet met.

In practice

Succession planning takes the form of a standing review rather than a document written once. Critical seats are listed, each with named internal candidates and an assessment of how ready they are: able to step up now, or ready later with specific development. Readiness changes, people leave, and roles are redefined, so the list is kept under review; an assessment left unexamined describes a business that has since moved on.

The second half of the work is external. The internal bench is read against the market: talent mapping across comparable companies establishes who outside could hold the seat, which sets an internal candidate against real alternatives rather than a default promotion. Two cases are also distinguished, because they call for different preparation: the orderly handover planned well ahead, and the emergency cover needed if a leader departs without warning.

Common questions

Is succession planning only for the C-suite?
No. It applies to any role whose sudden loss would disrupt the business, which can include specialist and single-point-of-failure positions well below the C-suite. Senior seats are the most visible case, since a gap there is public and replacement takes longest, but what puts a role in the plan is the disruption its absence would cause, whatever the title on it.
What is the difference between succession planning and a talent pipeline?
Succession planning is seat-first; a talent pipeline is people-first. Succession planning starts from specific critical roles and asks who could hold each one, while a talent pipeline builds a standing pool of qualified candidates for roles that may not exist yet. They overlap in practice, since a pipeline can be where a succession plan finds its external options, but the unit of planning differs.
Who is responsible for succession planning?
Responsibility is shared. For the most senior seats it sits with the board and the chief executive; human resources designs and runs the process; and line leaders contribute the readiness assessments, since they see the work closest. Where the process is left to human resources alone, the plan can end up recording names that the executives who would have to act on it have never tested.

Placed, not posted.

Join as talent, or hire through the Club.